Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Case Report
    P: 84-88
    September 2017

    Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

    Turk J Orthod 2017;30(3):84-88
    1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 26.07.2017
    Accepted Date: 24.08.2017
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    A 17-year-old female patient, whose chief complaint was her unpleasing smile, had skeletal and dental class II malocclusion, hypodivergent facial type with a severely increased overbite. Among the treatment options, upper-first-premolar extractions followed by miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction was the treatment of choice. After the initial levelling and alignment, miniscrews with 1.5- to 1.4-mm diameter and 7-mm lenght, were installed between the roots of the second premolars and the first molars, bilaterally. En-masse retraction was achieved on a 0.016x0.022-inch stainless steel archwire with 7-mm long power hooks placed distal to the lateral incisors, and with nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil springs exerting 250-gr of force per side. At the end of the treatment, deepbite, incisor inclinations and interincisal angle were corrected, and Class II molar relationship with good intercuspation was achieved. Upper 2-2, lower 3-3 retainers were bonded for retention. As a result, deepbite and Class II canine relationship was successfully corrected with simultaneous incisor intrusion and retraction using miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction.

    Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House