Does Maxillary Protraction with Alt-RAMEC Protocol Affect Inferior Sclera Exposure? A Controlled 3dMD Study
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Original Article
    P: 1-6
    March 2022

    Does Maxillary Protraction with Alt-RAMEC Protocol Affect Inferior Sclera Exposure? A Controlled 3dMD Study

    Turk J Orthod 2022;35(1):1-6
    1. Department of Orthodontics, Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 29.12.2020
    Accepted Date: 23.09.2021
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:

    The purpose of this controlled retrospective study was to measure and evaluate the inferior sclera exposure changes using 3dMD stereophotogrammetric images in a prepubertal Class III patient sample that underwent maxillary protraction with alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions protocol followed by facemask.

    Methods:

    The study group included 15 prepubertal patients (mean age: 9.85 ± 1.44 years) with Class III malocclusion due to maxillary retrognathism. Nine weeks of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions protocol was followed prior to 7 months of face mask treatment and 3 months of retention with Bionator. Pretreatment (T0) and post-retention (T1) lateral cephalometric radiographs and 3dMD images were retrieved from clinical archive. The same records were used for a control group of 15 well-matched, untreated patients (mean age: 9.4 ± 0.79 years). The distance between the upper eyelid margin and the lower eyelid margin was recorded as the overall eye height (E), and the distance between inferior limbus and the lower eyelid margin was recorded as inferior sclera exposure (S). The S : E ratio in percentage was calculated. Sella-nasion-A point angle (SNA) was used as the skeletal variable.

    Results:

    SNA angle, right S : E, and left S : E changed significantly in both groups at T1-T0. The intergroup comparison was highly significant for SNA angle but was not significant for right and left S : E variables.

    Conclusion:

    The S : E ratio decreased significantly in both alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions/facemask and the control groups. However, the change in S : E ratio between groups was not significant.

    Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House