E-ISSN 2148-9505
RELATED ARTICLES
Original Article
The Effect Of Topıcal Fluorıde Treatment On The Tensıle Bond Strength Of An Orthodontıc Bondıng Resın
(Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 31-36)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-1-31
Bond Sttrength Of Orthodontıc Dırect-Bondıng Brackets To Varıous Forces
(Turk J Orthod 1991; 4: 9-14)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-4-2-9
Experımental Investıgatıon Of The Effects Of Dıfferent Dırect Bondıng Materıal
(Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 112-118)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-2-112
“A Comparıson Of The Tensıle Bond Strength Of Metal, Plastıc And Ceramıc Brackets”
(Turk J Orthod 1992; 5: 92-97)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-5-2-92
Using Hemostatic Agents During Orthodontic Bonding: An In Vitro Study
(Turk J Orthod 2015; 28: 38-43)
DOI: 10.13076/TJO-D-14-00029
Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using Either Self-etching Primer or Conventional Method After Intracoronal Bleaching
(Turk J Orthod 2015; 28: 48-54)
DOI: 10.13076/TJO-D-15-00006
Physical Properties of Different Orthodontic Composites
(Turk J Orthod 2014; 27: 28-33)
DOI: 10.13076/TJO-D-14-00007
An In Vıtro Evaluatıon Of Bond Strength Of Dıfferent Cements
(Turk J Orthod 1994; 7: 119-122)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-7-2-119
The Tensıle Bond Strength Of Young Permanent Teeth Wıth Shorter Etchıng Tımes
(Turk J Orthod 1995; 8: 243-247)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-8-2-243
The Effects Of Sandblasting On The Shear Bond Strenghts Of Used Orthodontic Brackets: An Ex Vivo Study
(Turk J Orthod 1999; 12: 28-35)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-12-1-28
Shear Bond Strength and Temperature Rise of Orthodontic Brackets Bonding by Using a New 3-Second LED Mode
(Turk J Orthod 2013; 26: 45-50)
DOI: 10.13076/j.tjo.2013.26.01_45
Phosphorıc Acıd Etchıng Vs. Sandblastıng Of Enamel For Dırect Bondıng Of Metallıc Orthodontıc Brackets
(Turk J Orthod 2001; 14: 119-124)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-14-3-119
Effects Of Mouthwash And Varnısh Forms Of Antı-Mıcrobıal Agents On Shear Bond Strength Of Orthodontıc Brackets
(Turk J Orthod 2004; 17: 57-62)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-17-1-57
Measurement of The Centric Relation-Maximum Intercuspation Difference: MRI Versus The SAM® Mandibular Position Indicator
(Turk J Orthod 2006; 19: 199-208)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-19-3-199
Bond Strength Comparison of Two Self-Ligating Brackets with A Conventional Bracket
(Turk J Orthod 2009; 22: 37-44)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-22-1-37
Shear Bond Strength Evaluation of Different Composites Used As Lingual Retainer Adhesives
(Turk J Orthod 2008; 21: 196-205)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-21-3-196
Shear Bond Strength Comparison of Three Different Orthodontic Adhesives
(Turk J Orthod 2010; 23: 115-122)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-23-2-115
A Comparison of Conventional and Computerized Cephalometric Methods
(Turk J Orthod 2012; 25: 105-112)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-25-2-105
Shear Bond Strength Evaluation of a Cyanoacrylate Orthodontic Adhesive
(Turk J Orthod 2007; 20: 102-109)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-20-2-102
Effect of Orthodontic Bracket Base Structure on Shear Bond Strength
(Turk J Orthod 2006; 19: 141-150)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-19-2-141
Effects of High-Energy Curing Lights on Time-Dependent Temperature Changes of Pulp Space During Orthodontic Bonding
(Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 22-27)
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.19015
Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Metal Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Long-term Water-aged and Fresh Porcelain and Composite Surfaces
(Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 28-33)
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18034
Effects of Ozone and Prophylactic Antimicrobial Applications on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
(Turk J Orthod 2017; 30: 101-105)
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17032
Comparison of the Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using either a Self-Etching Primer or the Conventional Method after Intracoronal Bleaching
(Turk J Orthod 2015; 28: 77-81)
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00006R2
Does the Seating Force Affect the Shear Bond Strength of Brackets? An InVitro Study
(Turk J Orthod 2016; 29: 6-9)
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00009R1
Postoperative Positional and Dimensional Changes of Mandibular Canal after Bilateral Sagittal Split Set-Back Osteotomy
(Turk J Orthod 2017; 30: 110-117)
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17017
Does Activator Therapy Change Sagittal Mandibular Dimension and Glenoid Fossa Position? A Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
(Turk J Orthod 2007; 20: 239-249)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-20-3-239
Evaluatıon Of Cleaned Brackets For Rebondıng
(Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 312-316)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-2-312
Review
Standardization of Records in Orthodontics Part 2: Craniofacial Imaging Techniques
(Turk J Orthod 2012; 25: 167-187)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-25-2-167
Hıstorıcal Perspectıve And Current Status Of Cranıofacıal Imagıng In Orthodontıcs
(Turk J Orthod 2004; 17: 116-125)
DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-17-1-116
Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics
(Turk J Orthod 2016; 29: 16-21)
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00026R1
Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics
(Turk J Orthod 2018; 31: 86-94)
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17041
Reverse Engineering in Orthodontics
(Turk J Orthod 2018; 31: 139-144)
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18027
Key Words
Authors
All
Author's Corner
Survey
AVES | Copyright © 2018 Turkish Journal of Orthodontics | Latest Update: 25.03.2019